Home » Gear Reviews » Ski & Snow » Scott Luna (2013/2014)
Scott Luna (2013/2014) Review
October 1, 2013GEAR INSTITUTE RATINGS
60
Responsiveness
5
Resort Float
3
Versatility
3
Stability
3
Dampness
2
Value
4
The Good
- Light and easy to swing from foot to foot
- Suitable for small, lightweight women
The Bad
- Not a ton of pop or energy in the ski
- Not confidence boosting at high speeds
THE VERDICT
East Coasters will love Scott’s Luna for schussing hardpack in Vermont.
FULL REVIEW
Best suited for women dreaming of a narrow, easy-to-maneuver all-mountain ski. Intermediate to advanced skiers will be content with this one. If you’re planning to head into the back bowls or venture too far off piste, you may want to look for a wider ski.
Float
This ski is designed for hardpacked snow, but it does have a wee bit of tip rocker just in case you hit a patch of the soft stuff.
Versatility
Surprisingly fun in crud—the Luna held its own as an off-piste, all-mountain tool.
Length
The Luna comes in just two lengths—156 and 166 centimeters—but that should cover most women’s needs.
SPECS
women
124-84-114 mm
156, 166 cm
Weight (lbs.)0
RELATED CATEGORIES
RELATED LINKS
Subscribe
Login
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
USER REVIEWS
No reviews have been posted for this product.
Related posts