Scott Luna (2013/2014) ReviewOctober 1, 2013
- Light and easy to swing from foot to foot
- Suitable for small, lightweight women
- Not a ton of pop or energy in the ski
- Not confidence boosting at high speeds
East Coasters will love Scott’s Luna for schussing hardpack in Vermont.
Scott’s Luna was designed for playful, mellow skiers who spend most of their time on groomed snow. At 84 millimeters underfoot, it’s capable of heading off-piste, but most suited for the frontside.
Best suited for women dreaming of a narrow, easy-to-maneuver all-mountain ski. Intermediate to advanced skiers will be content with this one. If you’re planning to head into the back bowls or venture too far off piste, you may want to look for a wider ski.
This ski is designed for hardpacked snow, but it does have a wee bit of tip rocker just in case you hit a patch of the soft stuff.
Surprisingly fun in crud—the Luna held its own as an off-piste, all-mountain tool.
The Luna comes in just two lengths—156 and 166 centimeters—but that should cover most women’s needs.